Scientific Journal Of King Faisal University
Basic and Applied Sciences

ع

Scientific Journal of King Faisal University / Humanities and Management Sciences

The Reality of Innovation Management in Higher Education Institutions from Innovative Students’ Point of View

(Marhouna Hamad Al-Moqbali, Aisha Salim Al-Harthi, Khalaf Marhoon Al Abri and Said bin Sulaiman Al Dhafri)

Abstract

Innovation management plays a crucial role in harnessing innovations for economic development. Higher education institutions are considered one of the fundamental stages for embracing and supporting student innovations, especially in the early stages of ideation, selection and experimentation. Within this context, the current study aimed to understand the reality of innovation management in Omani higher education institutions at the pre-innovation stage. The study employed a descriptive methodology using a qualitative phenomenological research design. Data was collected through semi-structured interviews with a sample of 30 participants from two government universities and three private universities. The study utilised thematic analysis for data interpretation. In its findings, the study discusses the current reality of the management of the pre-innovation stage in Omani higher education institutions through five themes: announcing competitions, team formation, supervisory role, exploration of innovative ideas, and policies and regulations. The findings revealed that, despite efforts made by universities, there is a lack of planning or a defined roadmap for the innovation process. The study recommends implementing supportive policies and regulations for innovation, placing more emphasis on planning in the pre-innovation stage and adjusting supervision for students according to their innovative areas.
KEYWORDS
Innovation management, higher education, pre-innovation stage, innovation stage, innovation policies, Sultanate of Oman.

PDF

References

Al Buraiki, A. and Khan, F.R. (2018). Finance and technology: Key challenges faced by small and medium enterprises (SMEs) in Oman. International Journal of Management, Innovation and Entrepreneurial Research EISSN, 4(2), 1–12.  
Alkhanjari, A. and Matriano, M.T. (2021). Innovation first and foremost: The case of Oman's ranking in the global innovation index. Journal of Student Research, n/a(n/a), n/a. 
Alsalami, M.B. (2019). Iidarat Alaibtikarat Bialjamieat Alsaeudiat Kamadkhal Litaeziz Masadir Tamwiliha Tasawur Muqtarihin ’Managing Innovations in Saudi Universities as an Approach to Enhancing Their Funding Sources: A proposed scenario’. PhD Thesis, King Khalid University, Asir, Saudi Arabia. [in Arabic].
Bergmann, H., Hundt, C. and Sternberg, R. (2016). What makes student entrepreneurs? On the relevance (and irrelevance) of the university and the regional context for student start-ups. Small Business Economics, 47(n/a), 53–76.  DOI.org/10.1007/s11187-016-9700-6 
Bertello, A., Ferraris, A., De Bernardi, P. and Bertoldi, B. (2022). Challenges to open innovation in traditional SMEs: An analysis of pre-competitive projects in university-industry-government collaboration. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 18(n/a). 89–104. DOI.org/10.1007/s11365-020-00727-1 
Bessant, J. and Tidd, J. (2007). Innovation and Entrepreneurship. London, United Kingdom: John Wiley & Sons.
Boh, W.F., De-Haan, U. and Strom, R. (2016). University technology transfer through entrepreneurship: Faculty and students in spinoffs. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 41(n/a), 661–9. DOI.org/10.1007/s10961-015-9399-6
Braun, V. and Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. 
Christensen, C. M., Ojomo, E., Gay, G. D. and Auerswald, P. E. (2018). The third answer: how market-creating innovation drives economic growth and development. Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, 12(3–4), 10–26. 
Claussen, J. and Halbinger, M.A. (2021). The role of pre-innovation platform activity for diffusion success: Evidence from consumer innovations on a 3D printing platform. Research Policy, 50(8), 1–13. DOI.org/10.1016/j.respol.2020.103943
Der Foo, M., Wong, P.K. and Ong, A. (2005). Do others think you have a viable business idea? Team diversity and judges' evaluation of ideas in a business plan competition. Journal of Business Venturing, 20(3), 385–402.  DOI.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2004.04.001
Fletcher, A. (2023). The Role of Behavioral Economics in Competition Policy. Draft chapter for Cambridge Handbook on the Theoretical Foundations of Antitrust and Competition Law. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
Giudici, G., Guerini, M. and Rossi-Lamastra, C. (2019). The creation of cleantech startups at the local level: the role of knowledge availability and environmental awareness. Small Business Economics, 52(n/a), 815–30.  DOI.org/10.1007/s11187-017-9936-9
Govindaraju, V.C., Ghapar, F.A. and Pandiyan, V. (2009). The role of collaboration, market and intellectual property rights awareness in university technology commercialization. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, 6(04), 363–78.  DOI.org/10.1142/S0219877009001674
Gray, D.E. (2014). Doing Research in the Real World. London, United Kingdom: SAGE.
Halibas, A.S., Sibayan, R.O. and Maata, R.L.R. (2017). the Penta Helix Model of Innovation in Oman: an HEI Perspective. Interdisciplinary Journal of Information, Knowledge and Management, 12(n/a), 159–74. DOI.org/10.28945/3735 
Inderst, R. (2009). Innovation management in organizations. European Economic Review, 53(8), 871–87.  DOI.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2009.04.011
Kowang, T.O., Long, C.S. and Rasli, A. (2015). Innovation management and performance framework for research university in Malaysia. International Education Studies, 8(6), 32–45. 
Krauskopf, M., Krauskopf, E. and Méndez, B. (2007). Low awareness of the link between science and innovation affects public policies in developing countries: The chilean case. Scientometrics, 72(1), 93–103.  DOI.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1737-5
Creswell, J., and Booth, S. Translated by: Al-Thawaibah, A. (2019). Tasmim Albahth Alnaweii Dirasat Mueamaqatan Fi Khamsat 'Asalib‘Qualitative Inquiry Research Design  Choosing Among Five Approaches‘. Damascus, Syria: Dar Alfiker. [in Arabic]
Cresswell, J. Translated by: Al-Qahtani, A. (2019). Tasmim Albuhuth Alkamiyati- Alnaweiati- Almazjiati. Altabeat Althaaniatu‘Quantitative-Qualitative-Mixed Research Design‘. 2nd edition. Kuwait, Kuwait: Dar Al-Masila for Publishing and Distribution. [in Arabic].
Lašáková, A., Bajzíková, Ľ. and Dedze, I. (2017). Barriers and drivers of innovation in higher education: Case study-based evidence across ten European universities. International Journal of Educational Development, 55(n/a), 69–79. DOI.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2017.06.002
Lincoln, Y.S. and Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. London, United Kingdom: SAGE.
Malele, V., Mpofu, K. and Muchie, M. (2019). Bridging the innovation chasm: Measuring awareness of entrepreneurship and innovation policies and platforms at the universities of technology in South Africa. African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development, 11(7), 783–93. 
Ministry of Economy. (2021). Alwathiqat Alrayiysiat Ikhttt Altanmiat Alkhamsiat Aleashira (2021-2025ma) Alkhttt Altanfidhiat Al'uwlaa Jiruyat Eamaan 2040  ‘The Main Document of the Tenth Five-Year Development Plan (2021-2025 AD), the First Executive Plan for Oman Vision 2040‘. Available at: https://www.economy.gov.om/library/10thplan/index.html (accessed on: 01/10/2024).  [in Arabic].
Ministry of Higher Education and Research and Innovation. (2023 May 30). Waqaeat Alwazarat Alyawm Eaqd Daem Alhadinat Aleilmiat Mae Eadad Min Mwsssat Altaelim Aleali Fi Saltanat Euman, Wahi: Jamieat Alsultan Qabws‘. The Ministry Signed a Contract to Support Scientific Incubators with a Number of Higher Education Institutions in the Sultanate of Oman, Namely: (Sultan Qaboos University‘). Available at: https://twitter.com/moheriom/status/1663513966105219072 (accessed on: 01/22/2024). [in Arabic].
Oman Newspaper. (2023, July 6). Saltanat Euman Tastaerid Juhudaha Fi Taeziz Albahth Aleilmii Walaibtikar 'Amam Majmueat al 20 ’The Sultanate of Oman Reviews Its Efforts to Promote Scientific Research and Innovation Before the G20’. Oman Newspaper. Available at: https://cutt.us/Sqfml (accessed on: 01/15/2024). [in Arabic].
Ortt, J.R. and Van der Duin, P.A. (2008). The evolution of innovation management towards contextual innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management, 11(4), 522–38.
O'Shea, R.P., Allen, T.J., Morse, K.P., O'Gorman, C. and Roche, F. (2007). Delineating the anatomy of an entrepreneurial university: The Massachusetts Institute of Technology experience. R&d Management, 37(1), 1–16. DOI.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2007.00454.x
Ramachandran, N. and Yahmadi, H.M.A.A. (2019). Challenges faced by SMEs in Oman. Shanlax International Journal of Arts, Science and Humanities, 7(1), 15–25. DOI.org/10.34293/sijash.v7i1.49
Rao, B. and Mulloth, B. (2017). The role of universities in encouraging growth of technology-based new ventures. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, 14(04), n/a. DOI.org/10.1142/S0219877017500146
Rekonen, S. (2013). Managing Innovative Projects: Dynamics of Managerial Activities in the Front-End and Development Phases of Innovation Process. Licentiate Thesis, Aalto University, Espoo, Finland.
Salter, A. and Gann, D. (2003). Sources of ideas for innovation in engineering design. Research Policy, 32(8), 1309–24. DOI.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00119-1
Schumpeter, J.A. (1934). The Theory of Economic Development. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Harvard University Press.
Sharma, A. (1999). Central dilemmas of managing innovation in large firms. California Management Review, 41(3), 146–64.
Schweitzer, F. and Gabriel, I. (2012). Action at the front end of innovation. International Journal of Innovation Management, 16(06), n/a. DOI.org/10.1142/S1363919612400105
Şimşit, Z.T., Vayvay, Ö. and Öztürk, Ö. (2014). An outline of innovation management process: Building a framework for managers to implement innovation. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 150(n/a), 690–9. DOI.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.09.021
Thomas, D.R. (2003). A general inductive approach for qualitative data analysis. New Zealand: University of Auckland. 
Thompson, D.R., Kirkman, S., Watson, R. and Stewart, S. (2005). Improving research supervision in nursing. Nurse Education Today, 25(4), 283-90. DOI.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2005.01.011
Vahs, D. and Burmester, R. (2002). Innovations Management. Germany: Schäffer-Poeschek.
Wonglimpiyarat, J. and Yuberk, N. (2005). In support of innovation management and roger's innovation diffusion theory. Government Information Quarterly, 22(3), 411–22. DOI.org/10.1016/j.giq.2005.05.005
World Intellectual Property Organization. (2023). Global Innovation Index 2023, 16th Global Innovation Index 2023 Innovation in the Face of Uncertainty. World Intellectual Property Organization. Available at: https://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/wipo-pub-2000-2023-en-main-report-global-innovation-index-2023-16th-edition.pdf (accessed on 08/01/2024).
Wu, Y., Popp, D. and Bretschneider, S. (2007). The effects of innovation policies on business R&D: A cross-national empirical study. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 16(4), 237–53. DOI.org/10.1080/10438590600661939
Yordanova, Z., Bozev, V., Stoimenova, B. and Biolcheva, P. (2020). Innovation and Competitiveness of Universities–An Empirical Research. Available at: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-44322-1_32 (accessed on 10/01/2024).