Ease of Articulation in Selecting First Names

(Alawiya W.I. AL-Siyami)

---

Abstract

Investigating the ease of articulation in selecting names contributes to emphasizing the effect of articulatory features on speech perception and production. It explains why some names are distinctive among multi-semantic references and sociocultural dominance and are more likely appropriate for one sex than the other. This study explores how distinctive features of phonemes subconsciously derive our conception of first names, regardless of rich meanings or morphological endings. It argues that all selected names demonstrate articulatory-easy phonemes. Sex distinction is assumed to attribute phonemes of easier configurations to characterize girl names more than boy names. By inspecting a sample that exhibited no feminine suffixes or compounding structures, the study analyzed the phonemic components based on the articulatory-ease module. The findings justified equivalent preference of boy names and girl names to the ease of bilabial, coronal, voiceless features, and disyllabic structures. However, interest in names with easier anterior coronal sonorants, posterior distributed strident and glottal dominated the selected girl names in line with sound symbolism. Moreover, prominent everlasting names indicated a mechanism of articulatory ease that identified one essential unit to develop a unique smooth flow of phonemes. The distinctive characteristic features of this unit marked sex distinction and determined popularity.
KEYWORDS
articulatory mechanism, articulatory module, conserving effort, distinctive features, prominent names, sound symbolism

PDF

References

Ackermann, T. and Zimmer, CH. (2021). The sound of gender–correlation of name phonology and gender across languages. Linguistics, 59(4), 1143–77. DOI:10.1515/ling-2020-0077.
Al-Siyami, A. (2022). The sound structure of hell and heaven names. Shaqra University Journal for Humanities and Administrative Sciences, 10(1), 335–50.
Al Tamimi, Y. and Smith, M. (2023). Phonological features of Saudi Arabian anthroponyms. Arab World English Journal, 14(1), 486–501. DOI:10.24093/awej/vol14no1.31 
Alzamil, A. (2020). Analysis of the sociolinguistic status of Saudi female personal names. International Journal of Linguistics, 12(4), 127–38. DOI:10.5296/ijl.v12i4.17214 
Belvins, J. (2019). Evolutionary phonology as human behavior. In: N. Stern, R. Otheguy, W. Reid and J. Sackler (eds.) Columbia School Linguistics in the 21st Century. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins. 
Ghazeli, S. (1977). Back Consonants and Backing Coarticulation in Arabic. PhD Thesis, University of Texas, Austin, United States of America. 
Hall, T. (2007). Segmental features. In: P. DeLacy (ed.) The Cambridge Handbook of Phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lindblom, B. (1981). Economy of speech gestures. In: P. MacNeilage (ed.) The Production of Speech. New York: Springer. 
Kawahara, S., Noto, A. and Kumagai, G. (2018). Sound symbolism in Pokémon names. Phonetica, 75(3), 219–44. Doi:10.1159/000484938
Klink, R. (2001). Creating meaningful new brand names: A study of semantics and sound symbolism. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 9(2), 27–34.
MacNeilage, P. and Davis, B. (2000). On the origin of internal structure of word Forms. Science, 288(5465), 527–31. Doi:10.1126/science.288.5465.527
Monaghan, P. and Fletcher, M. (2019). Do sound symbolism effects for written words relate to individual phonemes or to phoneme features? Language and Cognition, 11(2), 235–55. Doi:10.1017/langcog.2019.20 
Roach, P. (2009). English Phonetic and Phonology: A Practical Course. 4th edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Odden, D. (2013). Introducing Phonology. 2nd edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ohala, J. (1983). The origin of sound patterns in vocal tract constraints. In: P. MacNeilage (ed.) The Production of Speech. New York: Springer.
PlotSet. (2023). Most Popular First Names. Available at: https://x.com/plotset/status/1672210597608407040?s=48 (accessed on 05/07/2023).
Shariatmandari, D. (2006). Sound difficult? Why phonological theory needs ‘ease of articulation’. SOAS Working Papers in Linguistics, 14(n/a), 207–26. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228682580_Sounds_difficult_Why_phonological_theory_needs_'ease_of_articulation' (accessed on 21/09/2021)
Sidhu, D.M. and Pexman, P.M. (2015). What's in a name? Sound symbolism and gender in first names. PloS/one, 10(5), 1–22. Available at: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0126809 (accessed on 19/09/2021).
Uno, R., Shinohara, K., Hosokawa, Y., Atsumi, N., Kumagai, G. and Kawahara, S. (2020). What’s in a villain’s name? Sound symbolism values of voiced obstruents and bilabial consonants. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 18(2), 428–57. Doi:10.1075/rcl.00066.uno 
Vihman, M. (1996). Phonological Development: The Origin of Language in the Child. Oxford: Blackwell.
Wu, L., Klink, R. and Guo, J. (2013). Creating brand personality with brand names: The effect of phonetic symbolism. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 21(3), 319–30. Doi:10.2753/mtp1069-667921306