Exploring Educators’ Perception of and Readiness for Hybrid Flexible Learning in Technical and Vocational Education and Training (TVET) in Higher Education

(Muliati Sedek and Che Ku Nuraini Che Ku Mohd )

---

Abstract

In Malaysia, technical and vocational education and training (TVET) focuses on equipping students with practical skills for specific careers, blending classroom instruction with hands-on training. Regarding hybrid flexible (HyFlex) learning, which integrates face-to-face and online instruction, TVET institutions face both opportunities and challenges in incorporating digital tools into practical training. This study explores educators’ perceptions of and readiness for HyFlex learning in TVET higher education. A quantitative survey was conducted with 30 purposively selected educators to assess their attitudes, beliefs, and preparedness concerning HyFlex implementation. The data were collected through an online questionnaire and analyzed using the SPSS v25 software. The educators viewed HyFlex learning positively, with mean scores above 3.29 indicating approval of its benefits. They also felt confident about students’ success (mean = 4.16) and their own technological skills (mean = 3.92). However, concerns were noted regarding increased workload (mean = 3.44) and the need for better training and resources, as reflected in the lower scores for instructional design (mean = 3.54) and access to resources (mean = 3.77). Therefore, enhancements in training and resources are necessary. This study recommends strategies to improve educators’ readiness, including the provision of clear workload guidelines, support for instructional design, professional development, technological resources, and a supportive institutional culture. Addressing these areas will facilitate more effective and sustainable adoption of HyFlex learning models.
KEYWORDS
hybrid flexible learning, educator perception, readiness, TVET, higher education, instructional design

PDF

References

Amran A. C., Ananta G. P., Hanafiah M. A. B. M., Ali, A., & Mohd C. K. N. C. K. (2020). Development of the Malaysian skills certification for lecturers in tertiary TVET institutions. Journal of Technical Education and Training, 12(1), 125–133. DOI:10.30880/jtet.2020.12.01.013.
Aziz, F. A., & Subramaniam, N. (2023). TVET in Malaysia: Current situation, challenges and recommendations. https://penanginstitute.org/publications/issues/tvet-in-malaysia-current-situation-challenges-and-recommendations/
Beatty, B. J. (2019). Hybrid-flexible course design: Implementing student-directed hybrid classes. EdTech Books.
Beetham, H., & Sharpe, R. (2013). Rethinking pedagogy for a digital age: Designing for 21st century learning. Routledge.
Broadbent, J., & Poon, W. L. (2015). Self-regulated learning strategies and academic achievement in online higher education learning environments: A systematic review. Internet and Higher Education, 27, 1–13.
Chen, Y., & Zhang, J. (2023). HyFlex learning in higher education: A comparative study of student and educator perceptions. Computers and Education, 183.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2017). The flat world and education: How America’s commitment to equity will determine our future. Teachers College Press.
Garcia, M., & Hernandez, A. (2021). HyFlex learning: A case study of implementation in a higher education institution. International Journal of Educational Innovation, 7(2), 34–45.
Gordon, N. (2014). Flexible pedagogies: Technology-enhanced learning. Higher Education Academy, 1(2), 2–14.‏
Graham, C. R., Henrie, C. R., & Gibbons, A. S. (2019). Developing models and theories for blended learning research. New Horizons in Adult Education and Human Resource Development, 33(4), 14–25.
Guzman, A., & Nussbaum, M. (2009). Teaching competencies for technology integration in the classroom. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25(5), 453–469.
Saharudin, M. S., Nahran, S. A., Nasir, N. A. C., Azli, M. S. M. N., & Muhamad, W. M. W. (2021). Prospect, issues, and challenges in Malaysia TVET-based education. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/356843609_Coordinated_Way_to_Deal_With_Schooling_Educational_Plan_Based_on_Current_Industry_Needs_in_Indonesia#page=22 
Sedek, M., & Hassan, S. N. S. (2019). Establishment of the globalized online learning policy and national e-learning center. In The impact of MOOCs on distance education in Malaysia and beyond (pp. 60–78). Routledge.
Hoffman, D. L., & Novak, T. P. (2015). Emergent experience and the connected consumer in the smart home assemblage and the internet of things. Journal of Consumer Research, 42(5), 850–868.
Hinsey, J. R. (2023). Factors influencing customer satisfaction at a fast food hamburger chain: The relationship between customer satisfaction and customer loyalty (Publication No. 10169573) [Doctoral dissertation, Wilmington University]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global.
Kaur, G. (2020). Digital life: Boon or bane in teaching pedagogy amid lockdowns. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 1.
Kali, Y., Goodyear, P., & Markauskaite, L. (2011). Researching design practices and design cognition: Contexts, experiences and pedagogical knowledge-in-pieces. Learning, Media and Technology, 36(2), 129–149.
Kralj, L. (2022). R3: Concepts, case studies, best practices, and blueprint for the strategical approach to digitalization A2: Exploring the institutional approach to digital strategy. Transform Education. https://transformeducation.eu 
Ling, Y. L., & Chua, W. W. (2023). Students engagement and students motivation as predictors of learning satisfaction in a synchronous hybrid learning space among the TVET students. JESS-Journal of Education on Social Science, 7(1), 1–16.
Makonye, J. P., & Ndlovu, N. S. (2023). Innovations in online teaching and learning: Case studies of teacher educators from South Africa during the COVID-19 era. AOSIS Publishing. 
Martinez, G., & Garcia, E. (2021). HyFlex learning and the challenges of workload management for educators. Workload Management in Education, 4(2), 123–135.
Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., & Jones, K. (2014). The effectiveness of online and blended learning: A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Teachers College Record, 115(3), 1–47.
Mohd C. K. N. C. K., & Shahbodin, F. (2021). Issues and challenges from teachers’ perceptions in creating online learning in the midst of covid-19 pandemic. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 99(12), 3039–3049.
O’Keefe, L., Rafferty, J., Gunder, A., & Vignare, K. (2020). Delivering high-quality instruction online in response to COVID-19: Faculty playbook. Every Learner Everywhere Network. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED605351.pdf 
Pelletier, K., McCormack, M., Reeves, J., Robert, J., & Arbino, N. (2022). 2022 Educause Horizon report: Teaching and learning edition. https://library.educause.edu/-/media/files/library/2022/4/2022hrteachinglearning.pdf?la=en&hash=6F6B51DFF485A06DF6BDA8F88A0894EF9938D50B 
Reinhart, J. M., Thomas, E., & Toriskie, J. M. (2019). The role of institutional support in faculty engagement with online learning. Online Learning Journal, 23(4), 1–20.
Singh, H., & Khan, M. (2023). HyFlex learning: A panacea for modern education or a double-edged sword? International Journal of Educational Technology, 9(1), 1–15.
Tomlinson, C. A. (2014). The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners. ASCD.
Thompson, M., & Thompson, K. (2022). The evolution of HyFlex learning: A historical perspective. Journal of Educational Evolution, 3(1), 67–82. 
Warschauer, M., & Matuchniak, T. (2010). New technology and digital worlds: Analyzing evidence of equity in access, use, and outcomes. Review of Research in Education, 34(1), 179–225.
Wu, W. (2022). Challenges, trends, and recommendations in digital transformation in global TVET: Methodology. https://unescoplatforms.szpt.edu.cn 
Zimmerman, B. J. (2012). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(2), 64–70.