Scientific Journal Of King Faisal University
Basic and Applied Sciences

ع

Scientific Journal of King Faisal University / Basic and Applied Sciences

Smell in Industrial Design: A Systematic Review

(Zati Hazira Ismail , Basyarah Hamat , Astuty Amrin and Abeer Allahham )

Abstract

A smell in industrial product design is defined as an awareness of the dimensions in design creation. Theoretical development for the role of smells in design has led to a significant increase in industrial design. However, despite numerous studies on smells within industrial design, a holistic overview through systematic reporting remains unavailable. In this paper, the authors conducted a systematic review of studies on smells in academic articles on industrial design. The review method was adopted from the Reporting Standards for Systematic Evidence Syntheses (ROSES). The academic databases involved are Scopus, Science Direct, Web of Science and Google Scholar. This study discovered that studies on smells in industrial design have researched the following aspects: 1) smells as design attributes; 2) users' perceptions based on smells; and 3) appraisals of smells embedded in products. Practitioners, educators and researchers can use this systematic review to examine the needs of smell-related sensorial concerns in the current product design applications.

KEYWORDS
Multisensory design, smell sensory, smell experience, product design, user experience

PDF

References

Bual, M. (2020). Scent as a modality: Study on the olfactory sense in multisensorial design. In: International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics, San Diego, California, USA, 16-20/07/2020.
Cash, P., Holm-Hansen, C., Olsen, S.B., Christensen, M.L., and Trinh, Y.M.T. (2017). Uniting individual and collective concerns through design: Priming across the senses. Design Studies, 49(n/a), 32–65. 
Chamorro-Koc, M., Popovic, V. and Emmison, M. (2009). Human experience and product usability: Principles to assist the design of user-product interactions. Applied Ergonomics, 40(4), 648–56.
Cho, M., Lee, S. and Lee, K.P. (2019). How do people adapt to use of an IoT air purifier? From low expectation to minimal use. International Journal of Design, 13(3), 21–38.
Crilly, N., Moultrie, J. and Clarkson, P.J. (2004). Seeing things: Consumer response to the visual domain in product design. Design Studies, 25(6), 547–77.
Diego-Mas, J.A. and Alcaide-Marzal, J. (2016). Single users' affective responses models for product form design. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 53(n/a), 102–14.
Feng, A., Chen, Y.V., Li, R. and Ding, L. (2019). How smell can help visually impaired in health and well-being–A cognitive experiment. The Design Journal, 22(sup1), 371–86.
Fenko, A., Schifferstein, H.N. and Hekkert, P. (2010). Shifts in sensory dominance between various stages of user-product interactions. Applied Ergonomics, 41(1), 34–40.
Gollety, M. and Guichard, N. (2011). The dilemma of flavor and color in the choice of packaging by children. Young Consumers, 12(1), 82–90.
Gusenbauer, M. and Haddaway, N.R. (2020). Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or meta‐analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 other resources. Research Synthesis Methods, 11(2), 181–217.
Hekkert, P. and Cila, N. (2015). Handle with care! Why and how designers make use of product metaphors. Design Studies, 40(n/a), 196–217.
Henshaw, V., McLean, K., Medway, D., Perkins, C. and Warnaby, G. (eds.). (2017). Designing with smell: Practices, techniques and challenges. London, UK: Routledge.
Kauppinen-Räisänen, H. and Jauffret, M.N. (2018). Using colour semiotics to explore colour meanings. Qualitative Market Research, 21(1), 101–17.
Kim, R.H. (2015). Development and emotional evaluation of scented clothing using microcapsules. Procedia Manufacturing, 3(n/a), 558–65.
Kivioja, K. (2017). Impact of point-of-purchase olfactory cues on purchase behavior. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 34(2), 119–31.
Koncar, V. (2016). Introduction to smart textiles and their applications. In: V. Koncar (ed.) Smart Textiles and their Applications. Cambridge, UK: Woodhead Publishing.
Lawson, G., Salanitri, D. and Waterfield, B. (2016). Future directions for the development of virtual reality within an automotive manufacturer. Applied Ergonomics, 53(Part B), 323–30.
Lin, S. and Sun, X. (2018). Ethnic differences in consumer preference for scented textile products. Journal of Textile and Apparel, Technology and Management, 10(3), 1–12.
Liu, J. and Duan, Q. (2019). Research of interaction design guided by five senses theory. In: International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, Orlando, Florida, USA, 26–31/07/2019.
Ludden, G.D. and Schifferstein, H.N. (2009). Should Mary smell like biscuit? Investigating scents in product design. International Journal of Design, 3(3), 1–12.
Ludden, G.D., Kudrowitz, B.M., Schifferstein, H.N. and Hekkert, P. (2012). Surprise and humor in product design: Designing sensory metaphors in multiple modalities. Humor, 25(3), 285–309.
Metatla, O., Maggioni, E., Cullen, C. and Obrist, M. (2019). "Like Popcorn" crossmodal correspondences between scents, 3D shapes and emotions in children. In: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, paper no.: 459, Glasgow, UK, 03/05/2019.
Nakamoto, T. (ed.) (2013). Human Olfactory Displays and Interfaces: Odor Sensing and Presentation. Tokyo, Japan: Tokyo Institute of Technology.
Nibbe, N. and Orth, U.R. (2017). Odor in marketing. In: A. Buettner (ed.) Springer Handbook of Odor. London, UK: Springer. 
Ramírez, E.R.R. (2014). Industrial design strategies for eliciting surprise. Design Studies, 35(3), 273–97.
Rimkute, J., Moraes, C. and Ferreira, C. (2016). The effects of scent on consumer behaviour. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 40(1), 24–34.
Rodgers, M., Sowden, A., Petticrew, M., Arai, L., Roberts, H., Britten, N. and Popay, J. (2009). Testing methodological guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic reviews: Effectiveness of interventions to promote smoke alarm ownership and function. Evaluation, 15(1), 49–73.
Ruzeviciute, R., Kamleitner, B. and Biswas, D. (2020). Designed to s(m)ell: When scented advertising induces proximity and enhances appeal. Journal of Marketing Research, 57(2), 315–31.
Schifferstein, H.N. and Desmet, P.M. (2007). The effects of sensory impairments on product experience and personal well-being. Ergonomics, 50(12), 2026–48.
Schifferstein, H.N., Fenko, A., Desmet, P.M., Labbe, D. and Martin, N. (2013). Influence of package design on the dynamics of multisensory and emotional food experience. Food Quality and Preference, 27(1), 18–25.
Spence, C. (2016). Multisensory packaging design: Color, shape, texture, sound, and smell. In: P. Burgess (ed.) Integrating the Packaging and Product Experience in Food and Beverages: A Road-Map to Consumer Satisfaction. Cambridge, UK: Woodhead Publishing.
Spence, C. (2017). Enhancing the experience of food and drink via neuroscience-inspired olfactory design. The Senses and Society, 12(2), 209–21.
Wang, Y., Yu, S. and Ma, N. (2018). A requirement-scenario-experience framework for evaluating wearable and fashionable design: Presenting underlying factors of user loss. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 68(n/a), 137–48.
West, A.J. and Carroll, K. E. (2014). A critical review of aroma therapeutic applications for textiles. Journal of Textile and Apparel, Technology and Management, 9(1), 1–11.
Xiao, Y. and Watson, M. (2019). Guidance on conducting a systematic literature review. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 39(1), 93–112.
Yin, R.K. (2017). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods. 6th edition. California, USA: Sage Publications.
Yoon, S.H., Kim, Y.W. and Ji, Y.G. (2018). Conceptual framework for affective and cognitive product design. In: The 7th International Conference of Design, User Experience, and Usability, Las Vegas, NV, USA, 15-20/07/2018.
Zuo, H., Jones, M., Hope, T. and Jones, R. (2016). Sensory perception of material texture in consumer products. The Design Journal, 19(3), 405–27.